Saber Interactive has recently updated the Steam page for its title Rideshare Simulator to include a clear disclaimer about the use of artificial intelligence in the game’s development. This move comes after a heated dispute that began when former writer Stella Sacco claimed she was dismissed from the project and replaced by content generated by AI tools, specifically ChatGPT. The controversy quickly escalated, drawing attention from gamers, industry observers, and the broader public, prompting the studio’s leadership to address the accusations head‑on. The full text of the newly added AI disclaimer reads as follows: "This update follows recent comments made by Saber Interactive’s chief executive officer, Matt Karch, concerning former writer Stella Sacco, who was employed by the company from July 2023 until July 2024.
Sacco alleges that she was removed from the Rideshare Simulator project midway through development and that her responsibilities were taken over by a language model, ChatGPT. She also alleges that other, as‑yet‑unannounced AI technologies were employed throughout the game's creation." In his public statements, Karch countered these allegations by saying that Sacco was "replaced by someone more talented and terminated for a variety of reasons a few months later," and he added a candid admission that, looking back, he would have been "happy to replace her with AI" if the situation had called for it.
He went on to explain his unfamiliarity with Sacco, noting, "Stella who? I had to ask Claude because I have never spoken to her or seen her," during an interview with the podcast This Week In Videogames. Karch also reiterated that Saber Interactive is already employing AI for specific aspects of the game and promised to update the Steam page once the final feature set is locked down. The CEO framed the use of AI as a consumer benefit, especially given that Rideshare Simulator is positioned as a lower‑priced title.
"We look at our use of AI in this particular game, which will be a lower priced title, as a plus for consumers," he said, suggesting that AI integration could lower production costs and potentially translate into a more affordable product for players. The dispute took another turn when Sacco posted on the social platform BlueSky over the weekend, stating that Karch had "apologised unreservedly for the awful way he spoke about me in the press." She wrote, "I've been firm from the beginning that I was telling the truth; I think we can all now agree that it's been borne out. Matt expressed a desire to make it right with me; at this time I don't really know what that looks like for me, and I'll have to take some time to sit with it, but I do at least accept his apology." Karch also issued a separate public comment on LinkedIn, where he admitted to an emotional reaction that preceded thoughtful consideration. "I unfortunately got triggered by certain later comments (for reasons I won't get into) and shot first and thought second about how to respond," he wrote.
"It happens and I am a human being. I have done what I can to rectify." The saga highlights several broader issues that are currently shaping the video game industry. First, the rapid adoption of AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and other large language models is prompting studios to rethink traditional workflows. While AI can accelerate tasks like dialogue writing, localization, and even level design, it also raises questions about authorship, creative integrity, and the treatment of human writers.
Sacco’s claim that she was replaced by an AI system underscores a fear among many creatives that their roles could become redundant as studios seek cost‑effective shortcuts. Second, the incident underscores the importance of transparent communication with both employees and the public.
By adding the AI disclaimer after the fact, Saber Interactive signaled a reactive approach rather than a proactive one. Industry best practices suggest that studios should disclose AI usage early in the development cycle, especially when it could affect the perception of a game's narrative quality or the credit given to human contributors.
Third, the episode serves as a reminder of the human element in corporate leadership. Karch’s admission that he reacted impulsively—"shot first and thought second"—resonates with many professionals who have found themselves caught in the heat of a public controversy.
His willingness to apologize publicly, albeit after the fact, may help mitigate some reputational damage, but it also illustrates how quickly statements can spiral when emotions run high. From a consumer perspective, the AI disclaimer may influence purchasing decisions. Some players appreciate the efficiency and novelty that AI can bring, while others worry about the authenticity of storylines and character development. By framing AI as a "plus for consumers," Saber Interactive is betting that the cost savings and potential for rapid content updates will outweigh any concerns about originality.
Looking ahead, the resolution of this dispute could set a precedent for how game studios handle AI integration and staff transitions. If Saber Interactive successfully navigates the apology and offers a concrete plan for reconciling with Sacco—perhaps through a settlement, public acknowledgment, or a collaborative project—other companies may follow suit, establishing clearer guidelines for AI use and employee treatment. In summary, Saber Interactive’s addition of an AI disclaimer to Rideshare Simulator’s Steam page marks a significant moment in the ongoing conversation about artificial intelligence in game development.
The controversy sparked by former writer Stella Sacco’s allegations, the CEO’s candid yet controversial remarks, and the subsequent public apologies illustrate the complex interplay between technology, creativity, and corporate responsibility. As the industry continues to experiment with AI, transparency, respectful communication, and thoughtful policy will be essential to ensure that both creators and consumers benefit from these powerful new tools.