The Fear of Transparency in the Gaming Industry

The gaming industry has a long history of being secretive, and this lack of transparency can have serious consequences. From the way companies handle layoffs to the secrecy surrounding game development, the industry's fear of transparency can lead to a lack of trust and understanding among consumers and employees alike. This week, Naughty Dog's layoffs and the company's handling of the situation have raised questions about the industry's approach to transparency. The use of non-disclosure agreements and the lack of clear communication can make it difficult for employees to know what is happening and for consumers to understand the development process. The industry's reluctance to share information can also lead to speculation and misinformation. In contrast, companies like Epic Games have shown that transparency can be beneficial, even in difficult situations like layoffs. By being open and honest, companies can build trust and demonstrate their commitment to their employees and customers. The International Age Rating Coalition (IARC) is another example of the industry's approach to transparency. The IARC's questionnaire for assigning age ratings to games has been criticized for being overly broad and vague, and the organization's reluctance to share the questionnaire with the public has raised concerns about transparency. However, the questionnaire itself is relatively straightforward, asking about the frequency and detail of violence, nudity, and other mature themes in games. The industry's fear of transparency can have serious consequences, from the mistreatment of contractors to the lack of accountability for companies. It is time for the gaming industry to re-examine its approach to transparency and to prioritize openness and honesty in its dealings with employees, customers, and the public.